Human spiritual structure is a complex and extensive formation on which science has been conducting research and observations for a long time. Theorists about the discovery of this formation present us with different portraits from different perspectives. When we examine the commonalities and differences of the theorists, the magnitude of the impact of the theorist's own life on the theory he creates draws attention. Just as a theorist who constantly migrates studies on identity confusion, and theorists who cannot communicate with their parents and feel a lack of family work on attachment theory, he weaves his own life traces into his theory, just as the artist incorporates the pain of love into his art by saying "the flame flickering in the lamp is cold". The subjectivity of the theorist actually shows us the uniqueness of the client who comes to us. The otherness and uniqueness of every relationship we establish is carried over to the therapy session in the same way.
While all the theoretical knowledge learned in studies on what heals the client has only a small effect of 10-15%, a real relationship with the client has a 45% effect. It is stated that it has a healing power of over Experiencing the communication balance in the session to the client should be seen as a great gain that the client can transfer to his/her life outside the session.
Is psychotherapy an art? Or is it a science? The multidimensionality of the work done today and the abstract nature of the working materials give signals that the debate will continue forever. Another factor affecting this question is science's low tolerance for abstraction and art's closeness to abstraction. In the field of science where we work on immeasurable values, working without breaking away from theoretical knowledge and science and without forgetting that the person in front of us is unique seems to be the basic criterion of being a therapist. Like being balanced and calm like an acrobat on a tightrope, natural and fluid like a painter…
Read: 0
